https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275777 The court determined that the delivery of goods and transfer of property occurred by 9th June 1995, making the defendant liable for payment. The plaintiff fulfilled payment obligations under the contract, entitling them to receive payment upon delivery. Disputes over the quantity of goods delivered were dismissed in favor of the plaintiff, supported by evidence. The arbitration clause defense was abandoned by the defendant. The court awarded interest on the principal amount, upholding the initial judgment. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the plaintiff. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:08:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275777 The court determined that the delivery of goods and transfer of property occurred by 9th June 1995, making the defendant liable for payment. The plaintiff fulfilled payment obligations under the contract, entitling them to receive payment upon delivery. Disputes over the quantity of goods delivered were dismissed in favor of the plaintiff, supported by evidence. The arbitration clause defense was abandoned by the defendant. The court awarded interest on the principal amount, upholding the initial judgment. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the plaintiff. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 01 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275777