https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275776 Statutory service rules governed the termination of a temporary Government servant on probation, and inconsistent appointment terms could not override them. Under the amended Rule 5(1)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, termination forthwith was valid even though one month's pay and allowances for the notice period were not tendered simultaneously, because payment was a right to be claimed and not a condition precedent. The administrative notification could not displace the statutory rule, as Government service conditions are regulated by rules made under Article 309 of the Constitution. en-us Thu, 23 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:06:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275776 Statutory service rules governed the termination of a temporary Government servant on probation, and inconsistent appointment terms could not override them. Under the amended Rule 5(1)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, termination forthwith was valid even though one month's pay and allowances for the notice period were not tendered simultaneously, because payment was a right to be claimed and not a condition precedent. The administrative notification could not displace the statutory rule, as Government service conditions are regulated by rules made under Article 309 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275776