<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14854</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the income of the spouse and minor child, as included under section 64, should be considered part of the total income of the assessee for taxation purposes. The judgment emphasized that the total income in the Finance Act is based on the total income computed under the Income-tax Act, and the provisions of section 64 must be followed for accurate tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14854</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the income of the spouse and minor child, as included under section 64, should be considered part of the total income of the assessee for taxation purposes. The judgment emphasized that the total income in the Finance Act is based on the total income computed under the Income-tax Act, and the provisions of section 64 must be followed for accurate tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>