<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</link>
    <description>A sister-province judgment is recognised and enforced where the originating court properly exercised jurisdiction on a real and substantial connection between the forum and the action. The common law rule was treated as better suited to Canadian interprovincial relations than a rigid foreign-judgment approach, because constitutional unity, mobility, order and fairness support enforcement. Reciprocal enforcement legislation was also described as procedural only and not as displacing common law recognition where its requirements are met, so it does not bar enforcement simply because the debtor did not submit to the original court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</link>
      <description>A sister-province judgment is recognised and enforced where the originating court properly exercised jurisdiction on a real and substantial connection between the forum and the action. The common law rule was treated as better suited to Canadian interprovincial relations than a rigid foreign-judgment approach, because constitutional unity, mobility, order and fairness support enforcement. Reciprocal enforcement legislation was also described as procedural only and not as displacing common law recognition where its requirements are met, so it does not bar enforcement simply because the debtor did not submit to the original court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>