<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld the enforcement of Alberta judgments in British Columbia based on the principle of reciprocity of jurisdictional practice. The court found that if British Columbia courts would have taken jurisdiction under similar circumstances, they should recognize Alberta&#039;s judgment. The decision emphasized the need to adapt legal principles to reflect modern interprovincial relationships and promote the enforcement of judgments across provincial lines in a federal state like Canada.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 331 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld the enforcement of Alberta judgments in British Columbia based on the principle of reciprocity of jurisdictional practice. The court found that if British Columbia courts would have taken jurisdiction under similar circumstances, they should recognize Alberta&#039;s judgment. The decision emphasized the need to adapt legal principles to reflect modern interprovincial relationships and promote the enforcement of judgments across provincial lines in a federal state like Canada.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>