<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 716 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275770</link>
    <description>Disgorgement could not be founded on an assumed finding of no illegal gains where the earlier enquiry had only examined alleged irregularities and had not quantified or determined unlawful profits. Acceptance of the enquiry report in disciplinary proceedings did not amount to a finding barring separate disgorgement action. The disgorgement order was also unsustainable because it was passed ex parte without a show-cause notice or hearing, violating natural justice. As disgorgement is an equitable remedy aimed at preventing unjust enrichment, it must rest on established unlawful gains and be imposed only after basic procedural fairness. The order was set aside, with liberty to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 716 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275770</link>
      <description>Disgorgement could not be founded on an assumed finding of no illegal gains where the earlier enquiry had only examined alleged irregularities and had not quantified or determined unlawful profits. Acceptance of the enquiry report in disciplinary proceedings did not amount to a finding barring separate disgorgement action. The disgorgement order was also unsustainable because it was passed ex parte without a show-cause notice or hearing, violating natural justice. As disgorgement is an equitable remedy aimed at preventing unjust enrichment, it must rest on established unlawful gains and be imposed only after basic procedural fairness. The order was set aside, with liberty to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>