<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notice in this case did not specify the charge against the assessee, creating ambiguity on whether the penalty was for concealing income or providing inaccurate particulars. As a result, the penalty proceedings were deemed unsustainable. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 864 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notice in this case did not specify the charge against the assessee, creating ambiguity on whether the penalty was for concealing income or providing inaccurate particulars. As a result, the penalty proceedings were deemed unsustainable. The penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>