<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 858 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 as the assessee proved the genuineness of cash credits. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the rental income from warehouse facilities should be classified as business income due to the nature of the assessee&#039;s activities. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 858 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 68 as the assessee proved the genuineness of cash credits. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the rental income from warehouse facilities should be classified as business income due to the nature of the assessee&#039;s activities. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>