<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 852 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the land acquired by the Government of Kerala and sold to Vizhinjam International Seaport qualified for the benefit under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act. Despite the negotiated sale agreement, the Tribunal considered the acquisition process as compulsory, citing precedent. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross Objection, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the section 10(37) benefit for the assessment year 2012-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 852 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the land acquired by the Government of Kerala and sold to Vizhinjam International Seaport qualified for the benefit under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act. Despite the negotiated sale agreement, the Tribunal considered the acquisition process as compulsory, citing precedent. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross Objection, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the section 10(37) benefit for the assessment year 2012-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>