https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368877 The Tribunal remanded the appeals back to the original authority to decide on jurisdiction first and then the merits of the case, following a similar previous order. Both appeals were allowed by way of remand, setting aside the Commissioner's order confirming the demand for differential duty and penalties, dropping the interest demand on the assessee. The Tribunal found that the impugned order had been set aside by remand, directing a fresh decision on the jurisdiction issue before addressing the merits of the case. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:48:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368877 The Tribunal remanded the appeals back to the original authority to decide on jurisdiction first and then the merits of the case, following a similar previous order. Both appeals were allowed by way of remand, setting aside the Commissioner's order confirming the demand for differential duty and penalties, dropping the interest demand on the assessee. The Tribunal found that the impugned order had been set aside by remand, directing a fresh decision on the jurisdiction issue before addressing the merits of the case. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368877