https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368867 The court condoned the delay in appealing and addressed the interpretation of Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The judgment emphasized the need for thorough adjudication on facts and law, leading to a remand of issues back to the Tribunal for further examination within a specified timeframe. The parties agreed to this decision, granting the Tribunal discretion for fact-finding. The appeal and stay application were disposed of, clarifying that the Tribunal was not bound by the High Court's observations and that allegations in the stay petition were not admitted without invited affidavits. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368867 The court condoned the delay in appealing and addressed the interpretation of Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The judgment emphasized the need for thorough adjudication on facts and law, leading to a remand of issues back to the Tribunal for further examination within a specified timeframe. The parties agreed to this decision, granting the Tribunal discretion for fact-finding. The appeal and stay application were disposed of, clarifying that the Tribunal was not bound by the High Court's observations and that allegations in the stay petition were not admitted without invited affidavits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368867