https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368866 The High Court dismissed three writ petitions challenging a common order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, citing the availability of an alternative remedy to appeal before the Tribunal. The court reiterated that due to the existence of a statutory appeal process, it could not entertain the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The grounds of challenge were found to be identical to a previously dismissed case, leading to the refusal to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368866 The High Court dismissed three writ petitions challenging a common order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, citing the availability of an alternative remedy to appeal before the Tribunal. The court reiterated that due to the existence of a statutory appeal process, it could not entertain the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The grounds of challenge were found to be identical to a previously dismissed case, leading to the refusal to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368866