<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 828 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT Credit on Tour Operator/Rent-a-Cab Service for the period up to 01.04.2011, citing a High Court decision establishing the service&#039;s direct relation to manufacturing activity. However, for the subsequent period up to 30.11.2011, the case was remitted for verification of the appellant&#039;s claim that no service was availed post 01.04.2011, with instructions to allow the benefit if proven. The judgment was pronounced on 11.10.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 828 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT Credit on Tour Operator/Rent-a-Cab Service for the period up to 01.04.2011, citing a High Court decision establishing the service&#039;s direct relation to manufacturing activity. However, for the subsequent period up to 30.11.2011, the case was remitted for verification of the appellant&#039;s claim that no service was availed post 01.04.2011, with instructions to allow the benefit if proven. The judgment was pronounced on 11.10.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>