https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368861 The Tribunal set aside the demands against the appellants concerning wrongly availed credit for common inputs used in production, confirming demands only for specific products post 01.03.2015. The requirement to maintain separate accounts under Cenvat Credit Rules was pivotal, with the Tribunal ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to the absence of credit availed for certain products. The Tribunal dismissed demands related to input services and allowed certain appeals, providing potential reliefs to the appellants. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368861 The Tribunal set aside the demands against the appellants concerning wrongly availed credit for common inputs used in production, confirming demands only for specific products post 01.03.2015. The requirement to maintain separate accounts under Cenvat Credit Rules was pivotal, with the Tribunal ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to the absence of credit availed for certain products. The Tribunal dismissed demands related to input services and allowed certain appeals, providing potential reliefs to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368861