<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 821 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368855</link>
    <description>The appellant contested the denial of refund for excess duty paid on &#039;Slides and Inner Frames&#039; for self-consumption during cigarette manufacturing. After various stages of appeal and remand, the Bench granted the appellant another opportunity to establish eligibility for the refund and provide necessary documents. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings, with instructions to cooperate and aim for resolution within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 821 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368855</link>
      <description>The appellant contested the denial of refund for excess duty paid on &#039;Slides and Inner Frames&#039; for self-consumption during cigarette manufacturing. After various stages of appeal and remand, the Bench granted the appellant another opportunity to establish eligibility for the refund and provide necessary documents. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings, with instructions to cooperate and aim for resolution within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>