<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 818 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that the Appellants were not entitled to SSI exemption under Notification No. 08/2003-CE due to the project not being notified as an international organization. However, the Tribunal allowed deduction for bought out items and determined duty liability on reduced turnover, resulting in no duty implication. The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 11-AC for claiming benefit under Notification No. 06/2006-CE, considering the Appellants&#039; efforts to seek clarification. No penalty was imposed for disallowance of Cenvat Credit as subsequent benefits should accrue when duty liability arises. The Tribunal also denied a refund of tax collected from buyers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 818 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that the Appellants were not entitled to SSI exemption under Notification No. 08/2003-CE due to the project not being notified as an international organization. However, the Tribunal allowed deduction for bought out items and determined duty liability on reduced turnover, resulting in no duty implication. The Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 11-AC for claiming benefit under Notification No. 06/2006-CE, considering the Appellants&#039; efforts to seek clarification. No penalty was imposed for disallowance of Cenvat Credit as subsequent benefits should accrue when duty liability arises. The Tribunal also denied a refund of tax collected from buyers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>