https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368849 The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant. The cenvat demand on security services used in the head office was set aside, while the credit for services in residential premises was required to be reversed. No interest or penalty was imposed due to the absence of revenue loss or fraudulent intent. en-us Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368849 The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant. The cenvat demand on security services used in the head office was set aside, while the credit for services in residential premises was required to be reversed. No interest or penalty was imposed due to the absence of revenue loss or fraudulent intent. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368849