<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1188 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275760</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions for both assessment years, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The deductions under Section 80IA(4)(iv) were allowed as there were no carry forward losses to be set off against profits. Additionally, the disallowance of legal and professional fees was partially deleted as the expenditures were found to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, citing precedents and principles established in prior judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1188 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275760</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions for both assessment years, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The deductions under Section 80IA(4)(iv) were allowed as there were no carry forward losses to be set off against profits. Additionally, the disallowance of legal and professional fees was partially deleted as the expenditures were found to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, citing precedents and principles established in prior judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>