<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1463 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the AO to apply a 10% gross profit rate on the disputed purchases and deleted the addition based on peak credit. The decision stressed the importance of concrete evidence to demonstrate the return of payments to the assessee for categorizing purchases as bogus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1463 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the AO to apply a 10% gross profit rate on the disputed purchases and deleted the addition based on peak credit. The decision stressed the importance of concrete evidence to demonstrate the return of payments to the assessee for categorizing purchases as bogus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>