<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275762</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availability of cenvat credit on rent-a-cab, insurance on plant, machinery, equipment, and goods exported. Citing various legal precedents, the court held that the issues had been decisively settled in favor of the appellant, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275762</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availability of cenvat credit on rent-a-cab, insurance on plant, machinery, equipment, and goods exported. Citing various legal precedents, the court held that the issues had been decisively settled in favor of the appellant, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>