https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275758 The court found the registered sale deeds valid, dismissing defendant No. 2's claims of collusion and lack of consideration. Defendant No. 7's admission of consideration shifted the burden of proof. Legal precedent established that defendant No. 2, lacking standing as a stranger to the transaction, could not challenge consideration without a legal interest in the property. Defendant No. 2, deemed a trespasser, lacked legal basis to dispute consideration, leading to the appeal's dismissal without costs awarded to either party. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:14:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275758 The court found the registered sale deeds valid, dismissing defendant No. 2's claims of collusion and lack of consideration. Defendant No. 7's admission of consideration shifted the burden of proof. Legal precedent established that defendant No. 2, lacking standing as a stranger to the transaction, could not challenge consideration without a legal interest in the property. Defendant No. 2, deemed a trespasser, lacked legal basis to dispute consideration, leading to the appeal's dismissal without costs awarded to either party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275758