https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275757 The court upheld the validity and operability of the deed of assignment, dismissing the plaintiff's claim that it was farzi or benami. The plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to the amount in the bank account, as the deed was deemed valid and supported by the defendant's consistent evidence. The court concluded that the deed was a genuine transfer for consideration, and the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 25 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:11:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275757 The court upheld the validity and operability of the deed of assignment, dismissing the plaintiff's claim that it was farzi or benami. The plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to the amount in the bank account, as the deed was deemed valid and supported by the defendant's consistent evidence. The court concluded that the deed was a genuine transfer for consideration, and the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275757