https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275755 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the bonds were validly executed for consideration by a competent person, not obtained through fraud or misrepresentation. The plaintiff, a bona fide assignee, was entitled to maintain the suit and recover the debts owed under the bonds. The trial court's judgment was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:59:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275755 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the bonds were validly executed for consideration by a competent person, not obtained through fraud or misrepresentation. The plaintiff, a bona fide assignee, was entitled to maintain the suit and recover the debts owed under the bonds. The trial court's judgment was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275755