<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 559 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275753</link>
    <description>Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act embodies the doctrine of lis pendens and, on public policy grounds, prevents a transfer during the pendency of a suit relating to immovable property from defeating the rights determined by the decree. A transferee pendente lite is bound by the result of the litigation and does not become a necessary or proper party as of right merely because the transfer occurred during the suit. The court held that the transferees were not entitled to impleadment as of right, and the order adding them was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 559 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275753</link>
      <description>Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act embodies the doctrine of lis pendens and, on public policy grounds, prevents a transfer during the pendency of a suit relating to immovable property from defeating the rights determined by the decree. A transferee pendente lite is bound by the result of the litigation and does not become a necessary or proper party as of right merely because the transfer occurred during the suit. The court held that the transferees were not entitled to impleadment as of right, and the order adding them was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>