<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1766 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275744</link>
    <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal. The exclusion of telecommunication expenditure from total turnover and export turnover was upheld, based on the lack of profit element. Additionally, disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 36 were considered in profit computation for exemption under section 10A. The CIT (A) order was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The order was pronounced on 31-03-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1766 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275744</link>
      <description>The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal. The exclusion of telecommunication expenditure from total turnover and export turnover was upheld, based on the lack of profit element. Additionally, disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 36 were considered in profit computation for exemption under section 10A. The CIT (A) order was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The order was pronounced on 31-03-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>