https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275743 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and Revisional Court, and restored the Trial Court's order regarding the default in rent payment and sub-letting by the tenant. The Court clarified that deposits under Section 30(2) should be considered when determining arrears under Section 20(4) of the U.P. Urban Building Act. The Supreme Court criticized the High Court's interpretation and emphasized harmonious reading of statutory provisions. No costs were awarded in this case. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:19:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275743 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and Revisional Court, and restored the Trial Court's order regarding the default in rent payment and sub-letting by the tenant. The Court clarified that deposits under Section 30(2) should be considered when determining arrears under Section 20(4) of the U.P. Urban Building Act. The Supreme Court criticized the High Court's interpretation and emphasized harmonious reading of statutory provisions. No costs were awarded in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275743