<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 771 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368805</link>
    <description>The court addressed issues raised by defendant no. 1 regarding lack of proper notice for auction, discrepancy in containers for auction, and inaction on suit for remaining containers. The auction was directed to be limited to 256 containers as per previous order, with proper notice required before proceeding. Defendant no. 1 was instructed to provide details on plans for remaining containers and progress of suit filed for them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 771 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368805</link>
      <description>The court addressed issues raised by defendant no. 1 regarding lack of proper notice for auction, discrepancy in containers for auction, and inaction on suit for remaining containers. The auction was directed to be limited to 256 containers as per previous order, with proper notice required before proceeding. Defendant no. 1 was instructed to provide details on plans for remaining containers and progress of suit filed for them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>