<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s order not legally sustainable due to incorrect application of duty exemption Notification. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, remanding the case for fresh determination of all issues, including confiscation and penalty, based on the correct duty liability. Adjudicating authority instructed to complete proceedings within three months of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s order not legally sustainable due to incorrect application of duty exemption Notification. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, remanding the case for fresh determination of all issues, including confiscation and penalty, based on the correct duty liability. Adjudicating authority instructed to complete proceedings within three months of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>