<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 761 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but set aside the penalty under Section 76. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially allowed due to the payment of the entire service tax amount with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 761 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but set aside the penalty under Section 76. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially allowed due to the payment of the entire service tax amount with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>