https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368793 The Tribunal recognized the appellant's entitlement to CENVAT credit despite invoices not being addressed directly to them, due to a tripartite arrangement with M/s Deutsch Bank A.G. and M/s Bloomerg. Emphasizing the appellant's payment for services, the Tribunal directed a re-examination by the original authority to determine eligibility under Rule 9(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was allowed for a fresh adjudication order, stressing the necessity of a personal hearing for the appellant during the reassessment. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:10:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368793 The Tribunal recognized the appellant's entitlement to CENVAT credit despite invoices not being addressed directly to them, due to a tripartite arrangement with M/s Deutsch Bank A.G. and M/s Bloomerg. Emphasizing the appellant's payment for services, the Tribunal directed a re-examination by the original authority to determine eligibility under Rule 9(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was allowed for a fresh adjudication order, stressing the necessity of a personal hearing for the appellant during the reassessment. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368793