https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368792 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand against the appellants for allegedly issuing non-duty paying invoices, citing lack of substantial evidence linking the invoices to clandestine removal of goods. Discrepancies in the Revenue's evidence, including retracted statements and unconfirmed deliveries, led the Tribunal to conclude that the charge was unproven. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the absence of supporting factors like increased electricity consumption or raw material procurement. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:10:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368792 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand against the appellants for allegedly issuing non-duty paying invoices, citing lack of substantial evidence linking the invoices to clandestine removal of goods. Discrepancies in the Revenue's evidence, including retracted statements and unconfirmed deliveries, led the Tribunal to conclude that the charge was unproven. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the absence of supporting factors like increased electricity consumption or raw material procurement. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368792