https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275740 A foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is enforceable in India once Sections 47 and 48 are satisfied, and enforcement cannot be defeated by relying on foreign domestic enforcement formalities such as leave requirements in the country of origin. A duress-based public policy objection failed because the arbitrator had assessed the evidence and commercial conduct, and enforcement proceedings do not permit a rehearing on those findings. Non-stamping or non-registration also did not bar execution of the foreign award. The award was therefore treated as executable, and the enforcement objections were rejected. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:35:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275740 A foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is enforceable in India once Sections 47 and 48 are satisfied, and enforcement cannot be defeated by relying on foreign domestic enforcement formalities such as leave requirements in the country of origin. A duress-based public policy objection failed because the arbitrator had assessed the evidence and commercial conduct, and enforcement proceedings do not permit a rehearing on those findings. Non-stamping or non-registration also did not bar execution of the foreign award. The award was therefore treated as executable, and the enforcement objections were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275740