https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275738 An application to file and enforce a foreign award under section 5(1) of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 was held to remain subject to the forum's procedural law where the Act is silent. The expression "subject-matter of the award" was read as the relief granted by the award, but it did not displace territorial jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Article III of the New York Convention was treated as requiring enforcement according to the procedural rules of the territory. As no party against whom enforcement was sought carried on business in Bhavnagar and no part of the cause of action arose there, Bhavnagar Court lacked jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:13:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275738 An application to file and enforce a foreign award under section 5(1) of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 was held to remain subject to the forum's procedural law where the Act is silent. The expression "subject-matter of the award" was read as the relief granted by the award, but it did not displace territorial jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Article III of the New York Convention was treated as requiring enforcement according to the procedural rules of the territory. As no party against whom enforcement was sought carried on business in Bhavnagar and no part of the cause of action arose there, Bhavnagar Court lacked jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275738