<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 799 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275732</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision to compute the long term capital gain from the agreement date for property acquisition, rather than the payment dates. The ITAT cited various judgments supporting this approach, resulting in the revenue&#039;s appeal being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 799 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275732</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision to compute the long term capital gain from the agreement date for property acquisition, rather than the payment dates. The ITAT cited various judgments supporting this approach, resulting in the revenue&#039;s appeal being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>