<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275726</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a challenge to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 1997-1998. The Court found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence supporting the penalty imposition based on estimation, ultimately deeming the penalty unwarranted. The decision was influenced by previous judgments and the absence of sufficient grounds to uphold the penalty, leading to the disposal of the matter in favor of the assessee against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:42:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275726</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a challenge to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 1997-1998. The Court found in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence supporting the penalty imposition based on estimation, ultimately deeming the penalty unwarranted. The decision was influenced by previous judgments and the absence of sufficient grounds to uphold the penalty, leading to the disposal of the matter in favor of the assessee against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>