<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14829</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held that the assessee, who won a lottery, was not exempt from paying tax on the winnings by asserting an oral agreement to share the prize. The court deemed the oral agreement unconvincing since the ticket was bought with the assessee&#039;s own money and no external contributions were made. Consequently, the tax was correctly imposed on the assessee, and the entire prize amount is subject to taxation in his capacity as an individual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14829</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held that the assessee, who won a lottery, was not exempt from paying tax on the winnings by asserting an oral agreement to share the prize. The court deemed the oral agreement unconvincing since the ticket was bought with the assessee&#039;s own money and no external contributions were made. Consequently, the tax was correctly imposed on the assessee, and the entire prize amount is subject to taxation in his capacity as an individual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>