<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 736 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not deliberately conceal undisclosed income and that the additions made during the block assessment period were not justified. The Tribunal noted the discrepancies in stock valuation and the explanation provided for unexplained cash, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and overturning the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 736 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not deliberately conceal undisclosed income and that the additions made during the block assessment period were not justified. The Tribunal noted the discrepancies in stock valuation and the explanation provided for unexplained cash, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and overturning the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>