<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 735 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368769</link>
    <description>The court directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the ancestral agricultural land sold was not a capital asset. If proven, no capital gains would be chargeable. The deduction u/s 54B for purchasing new agricultural land was denied for the second purchase due to failure in proving the source of funds within the specified time limit. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision announced on October 9, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 735 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368769</link>
      <description>The court directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the ancestral agricultural land sold was not a capital asset. If proven, no capital gains would be chargeable. The deduction u/s 54B for purchasing new agricultural land was denied for the second purchase due to failure in proving the source of funds within the specified time limit. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision announced on October 9, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>