https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368759 The Tribunal upheld the CIT-A's decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer concerning medical expenses incurred by the assessee for an employee's treatment in a foreign hospital. The Tribunal found that no RBI permission was required for the expenditure, as supported by evidence, and ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of non-deduction of TDS on interest payments back to the AO for further examination. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:08:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368759 The Tribunal upheld the CIT-A's decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer concerning medical expenses incurred by the assessee for an employee's treatment in a foreign hospital. The Tribunal found that no RBI permission was required for the expenditure, as supported by evidence, and ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of non-deduction of TDS on interest payments back to the AO for further examination. The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368759