<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 694 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal, granting consequential benefits to the Appellant. The denial of CENVAT Credit was found to be solely based on availing credit after the prescribed period, which the Tribunal determined fell within the time limit prescribed by a specific notification, referencing a similar case decided by the Mumbai Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 15:04:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 694 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal, granting consequential benefits to the Appellant. The denial of CENVAT Credit was found to be solely based on availing credit after the prescribed period, which the Tribunal determined fell within the time limit prescribed by a specific notification, referencing a similar case decided by the Mumbai Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>