<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 692 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11D of the Central Excise Act applies to a manufacturer&#039;s depot, even if not directly liable for duty. Excess amounts collected must be deposited with the Central Government, as credit notes do not suffice. The Tribunal ruled that returning excess amounts via credit notes does not fulfill the obligation. Regarding the period of limitation, the Tribunal clarified that Section 11D does not have a specific limitation period, upholding the demand for the excess amount collected as legally valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 692 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 11D of the Central Excise Act applies to a manufacturer&#039;s depot, even if not directly liable for duty. Excess amounts collected must be deposited with the Central Government, as credit notes do not suffice. The Tribunal ruled that returning excess amounts via credit notes does not fulfill the obligation. Regarding the period of limitation, the Tribunal clarified that Section 11D does not have a specific limitation period, upholding the demand for the excess amount collected as legally valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>