https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368720 Where a similar dispute had already been addressed in earlier proceedings, the Court did not decide the underlying refund and interest entitlement on merits. It directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for deletion of the restrictive condition in the eligibility certificate, and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after affording personal hearing. The respondents were also required to keep in view the earlier Division Bench decision and the prior writ order. The writ petition was thus disposed of by way of administrative reconsideration, without a substantive adjudication of the tax claim. en-us Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368720 Where a similar dispute had already been addressed in earlier proceedings, the Court did not decide the underlying refund and interest entitlement on merits. It directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for deletion of the restrictive condition in the eligibility certificate, and to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after affording personal hearing. The respondents were also required to keep in view the earlier Division Bench decision and the prior writ order. The writ petition was thus disposed of by way of administrative reconsideration, without a substantive adjudication of the tax claim. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368720