https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275711 Temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, along with prima facie maintainability of the suit. A decree passed by a court with jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter does not become a nullity merely because the underlying suit may have been time-barred; that is not the same as absence of inherent jurisdiction. Where an injunction would effectively stall execution of a final decree that has attained finality, and allegations of fraud do not displace the concluded decree, the balance of convenience and risk of injury weigh against interim restraint. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:27:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275711 Temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, along with prima facie maintainability of the suit. A decree passed by a court with jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter does not become a nullity merely because the underlying suit may have been time-barred; that is not the same as absence of inherent jurisdiction. Where an injunction would effectively stall execution of a final decree that has attained finality, and allegations of fraud do not displace the concluded decree, the balance of convenience and risk of injury weigh against interim restraint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275711