https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275709 A pre-amendment electricity rate-fixing order made under the 1948 Act remained effective after the 1956 amendment because the later provisions were prospective, contained no deeming fiction displacing the earlier order, and showed no contrary intention. The saving principle under the General Clauses Act preserved the operation of the validly made order despite repeal and re-enactment. As a result, the licensee was bound by the 1951 order and could not unilaterally enhance charges in breach of it. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:20:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275709 A pre-amendment electricity rate-fixing order made under the 1948 Act remained effective after the 1956 amendment because the later provisions were prospective, contained no deeming fiction displacing the earlier order, and showed no contrary intention. The saving principle under the General Clauses Act preserved the operation of the validly made order despite repeal and re-enactment. As a result, the licensee was bound by the 1951 order and could not unilaterally enhance charges in breach of it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275709