<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1326 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the DGHS and ECHS qualify as &#039;enterprises&#039; under Section 2(h) of the Competition Act, 2002, as they engage in the provision of healthcare services, which do not fall under sovereign functions. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the Commission had erred in its interpretation and dismissed the initial decision. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the Commission for reconsideration. The Commission was instructed to take a prima facie view on whether there is a case for investigation under Section 26(1) of the Act, acknowledging DGHS as an &#039;enterprise&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1326 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the DGHS and ECHS qualify as &#039;enterprises&#039; under Section 2(h) of the Competition Act, 2002, as they engage in the provision of healthcare services, which do not fall under sovereign functions. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the Commission had erred in its interpretation and dismissed the initial decision. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the Commission for reconsideration. The Commission was instructed to take a prima facie view on whether there is a case for investigation under Section 26(1) of the Act, acknowledging DGHS as an &#039;enterprise&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>