<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1327 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter to the Commission for a fresh decision on penalties. It directed the appellants to submit fresh representations, including turnover figures for LPG cylinders of 14.2 Kg over the last three financial years, and separate turnover figures for other products. The Commission was instructed to provide a hearing opportunity to the appellants, consider mitigating factors, and determine penalties based on the relevant turnover of the specific product involved in the anti-competitive conduct. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a fair and objective assessment of penalties, ensuring reasoned orders that account for all relevant circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1327 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter to the Commission for a fresh decision on penalties. It directed the appellants to submit fresh representations, including turnover figures for LPG cylinders of 14.2 Kg over the last three financial years, and separate turnover figures for other products. The Commission was instructed to provide a hearing opportunity to the appellants, consider mitigating factors, and determine penalties based on the relevant turnover of the specific product involved in the anti-competitive conduct. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for a fair and objective assessment of penalties, ensuring reasoned orders that account for all relevant circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>