<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1586 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275698</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage, criminal prosecution must rest on a clear prima facie basis, and vague allegations of illegal gratification, irregular allotment, or forgery are insufficient when the record does not show direct demand, acceptance, or a reliable role by the accused. A conspiracy charge also weakens where the alleged principal conspirators and corporate entities said to have supplied the gratification are not properly before the court, especially when the core linkage is already broken. The parity principle applies where a co-accused&#039;s proceedings have been quashed on the same foundational material. The commentary therefore treats unsupported corruption and conspiracy allegations as incapable of sustaining further trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1586 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275698</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage, criminal prosecution must rest on a clear prima facie basis, and vague allegations of illegal gratification, irregular allotment, or forgery are insufficient when the record does not show direct demand, acceptance, or a reliable role by the accused. A conspiracy charge also weakens where the alleged principal conspirators and corporate entities said to have supplied the gratification are not properly before the court, especially when the core linkage is already broken. The parity principle applies where a co-accused&#039;s proceedings have been quashed on the same foundational material. The commentary therefore treats unsupported corruption and conspiracy allegations as incapable of sustaining further trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>