<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (11) TMI 3 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275693</link>
    <description>Profits from cultivating aloe plants and preparing sisal fibre were treated as agricultural income because the statutory concept of agricultural income includes processes ordinarily employed by a cultivator to make produce fit for market. On the facts, aloe fibre cultivation was not shown to exist as an established commercial activity apart from the assessee&#039;s own operations, and there was no real open market for aloe leaves. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on jail manufacture was rejected as not reflecting an ordinary cultivator&#039;s process or a true market standard. The fibre-preparation activity was therefore regarded as part of the agricultural operation itself, and the resulting profit was exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (11) TMI 3 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275693</link>
      <description>Profits from cultivating aloe plants and preparing sisal fibre were treated as agricultural income because the statutory concept of agricultural income includes processes ordinarily employed by a cultivator to make produce fit for market. On the facts, aloe fibre cultivation was not shown to exist as an established commercial activity apart from the assessee&#039;s own operations, and there was no real open market for aloe leaves. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on jail manufacture was rejected as not reflecting an ordinary cultivator&#039;s process or a true market standard. The fibre-preparation activity was therefore regarded as part of the agricultural operation itself, and the resulting profit was exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>