https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275691 SARFAESI challenges to secured-creditor measures are ordinarily pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal where an effective statutory remedy is available against action under Section 13(4), limiting recourse to writ jurisdiction. A fresh demand notice under Section 13(2) is not automatically barred merely because an earlier notice was issued and objections were raised. Where earlier proceedings remained in abeyance and subsequent action followed disposal of related claims, no statutory prohibition prevents issuance of a later notice. The availability of the Tribunal remedy and absence of a legal bar can defeat a challenge to subsequent SARFAESI action. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:48:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275691 SARFAESI challenges to secured-creditor measures are ordinarily pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal where an effective statutory remedy is available against action under Section 13(4), limiting recourse to writ jurisdiction. A fresh demand notice under Section 13(2) is not automatically barred merely because an earlier notice was issued and objections were raised. Where earlier proceedings remained in abeyance and subsequent action followed disposal of related claims, no statutory prohibition prevents issuance of a later notice. The availability of the Tribunal remedy and absence of a legal bar can defeat a challenge to subsequent SARFAESI action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275691