<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275685</link>
    <description>Limitation for compensation claims against a carrier for loss or injury to goods runs for one year from when the injury occurs under Article 30 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The commencement is not deferred until the consignee knows the full extent of damage, although the carrier relying on limitation must establish that the injury occurred more than one year before suit. Correspondence stating that a claim is being investigated, requesting restraint from litigation, or recording damage assessment does not save limitation unless it clearly acknowledges liability to pay compensation. Claims instituted after the limitation period are therefore barred where no valid acknowledgment exists.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275685</link>
      <description>Limitation for compensation claims against a carrier for loss or injury to goods runs for one year from when the injury occurs under Article 30 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The commencement is not deferred until the consignee knows the full extent of damage, although the carrier relying on limitation must establish that the injury occurred more than one year before suit. Correspondence stating that a claim is being investigated, requesting restraint from litigation, or recording damage assessment does not save limitation unless it clearly acknowledges liability to pay compensation. Claims instituted after the limitation period are therefore barred where no valid acknowledgment exists.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>