<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 13 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14813</link>
    <description>The HC affirmed that penalty proceedings under s.271 require the assessing authority to record its satisfaction; absent such a finding in the assessment order, initiation of penalty cannot be presumed. The Tribunal rightly rejected the Department&#039;s s.256(1) application, and the Department&#039;s petition under s.256(2) was dismissed. Consequently, the penalty was not sustained and the challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s decision fails; dismissal was ordered without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 13 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14813</link>
      <description>The HC affirmed that penalty proceedings under s.271 require the assessing authority to record its satisfaction; absent such a finding in the assessment order, initiation of penalty cannot be presumed. The Tribunal rightly rejected the Department&#039;s s.256(1) application, and the Department&#039;s petition under s.256(2) was dismissed. Consequently, the penalty was not sustained and the challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s decision fails; dismissal was ordered without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>